https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3165769##
* Abstract*
The objective of our paper is to obtain a better understanding of how
auditors anticipate the potential for PCAOB inspection, experience the
inspection, cope with the consequences of the inspection, and understand
the PCAOB’s influence within the context of professionalism. We use a
qualitative approach that employs both surveys (55) and interviews (20) of
auditors (of varying rank and firm) across a five-year period (2012-2017).
Respondents suggest that PCAOB inspectors are powerful, representing the
‘prosecution’, ‘judge’, and ‘jury’ of the auditing profession. We therefore
employ a structural metaphor of the PCAOB inspection as a judicial ‘trial’.
By controlling the criteria for which to evaluate performance, inspectors
have the power to repeatedly ‘subpoena’, ‘interrogate’, and return a
‘verdict’ on the firm (auditor); those judged as ‘guilty’ require
supervised ‘probation’. This process is perceived as having improved audit
quality, but at a cost. Passing an inspection is so important, that
auditors (firms) have resorted to impression management strategies and
“functionally stupid” work practices (e.g., excessive documentation, a
decrease in critical thinking as a result of a “box ticking” approach to
auditing). Further, some respondents believe that being a good auditor has
come at the expense of being a good accountant; the emphasis on audit
process and concurrent de-emphasis on technical accounting could ultimately
lead to audits themselves falling short. In addition, it is evident that
inspectors and auditors differ in their perceptions of risk; likely
manifesting because inspectors are standards focused while auditors (firms)
are methodology focused. Finally, the inspection process has created
excessive stress and tension, beyond budget and fee pressures, which some
auditors perceive as affecting the pool of talented auditors that firms may
be able to attract and retain in the future.
* Keywords:* Auditing, Inspections, Metaphor, PCAOB, Professionalism,
Qualitative
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment