Thursday, August 23, 2018

Aaron Beam of Health South

https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/podcast/healthsouth-fraud-lessons-learned.html There is a 20 minute podcast with Aaron Beam discussing his time at Health South

Wednesday, August 15, 2018

A proposed standard change

Proposed revisions to SSAE 18. terminology for what have been known as "review engagements" is proposed. Comments due Oct 11. https://www.aicpa.org/content/dam/aicpa/research/exposuredrafts/accountingandauditing/downloadabledocuments/20180711a-ed-ssae-18-revisions.pdf

Monday, August 6, 2018

Language and fraud risk

https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/issues/2018/aug/how-language-affects-fraud-risk.html Much of the article is about nonverbal communnications, such as email, and the use of emojis in several contexts. Emojis being considered as evidence in legal hearings, and the idea of emojis as code words among a network of conspirators. Very interesting article.

Thursday, August 2, 2018

Bentham Project

https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bentham-project/ Resources related to Jeremy Bentham, whose theory of utilitarianism is one ethical model helpful when considering ethical dilemmas

Wednesday, July 25, 2018

PCAOB revolving door of employees to audit firms

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3205578 This paper provides basic facts on worker flows between former Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) employees and large audit firms. Using a large sample of publicly available curricula vitae, we document that an increasing number of former PCAOB employees join U.S. audit firms in senior-level positions during recent years. We also find that the number of PCAOB employees hired by these firms is positively related to the number of deficiencies reported in their prior PCAOB inspection report, and that the number of deficiencies reported in firms’ future inspection reports is negatively associated with the number of former PCAOB employees hired. However, this latter relation is not observed for the year in which these employees join the firm, but rather during the subsequent period when the employees would be less likely to have personal access to private information about the firm’s annual inspection. Although this pattern of findings is generally supportive of a “human capital” hypothesis, we are unable to rule out that the future reductions may be attributable to former PCAOB employees that obtain confidential information about future inspections via former colleagues at the PCAOB.

Sunday, July 15, 2018

Design Thinking

https://auditfutures.net/designing-education We are developing resources and offer support in creating capacities for rethinking education and the future of work.

Wednesday, June 20, 2018

Blockchain - beyond the hype

https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/blockchain-beyond-the-hype-what-is-the-strategic-business-value

PCAOB Inspections: Public Accounting Firms on 'Trial'

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3165769##

* Abstract* The objective of our paper is to obtain a better understanding of how auditors anticipate the potential for PCAOB inspection, experience the inspection, cope with the consequences of the inspection, and understand the PCAOB’s influence within the context of professionalism. We use a qualitative approach that employs both surveys (55) and interviews (20) of auditors (of varying rank and firm) across a five-year period (2012-2017). Respondents suggest that PCAOB inspectors are powerful, representing the ‘prosecution’, ‘judge’, and ‘jury’ of the auditing profession. We therefore employ a structural metaphor of the PCAOB inspection as a judicial ‘trial’. By controlling the criteria for which to evaluate performance, inspectors have the power to repeatedly ‘subpoena’, ‘interrogate’, and return a ‘verdict’ on the firm (auditor); those judged as ‘guilty’ require supervised ‘probation’. This process is perceived as having improved audit quality, but at a cost. Passing an inspection is so important, that auditors (firms) have resorted to impression management strategies and “functionally stupid” work practices (e.g., excessive documentation, a decrease in critical thinking as a result of a “box ticking” approach to auditing). Further, some respondents believe that being a good auditor has come at the expense of being a good accountant; the emphasis on audit process and concurrent de-emphasis on technical accounting could ultimately lead to audits themselves falling short. In addition, it is evident that inspectors and auditors differ in their perceptions of risk; likely manifesting because inspectors are standards focused while auditors (firms) are methodology focused. Finally, the inspection process has created excessive stress and tension, beyond budget and fee pressures, which some auditors perceive as affecting the pool of talented auditors that firms may be able to attract and retain in the future.
* Keywords:* Auditing, Inspections, Metaphor, PCAOB, Professionalism, Qualitative

Monday, May 14, 2018

International Code of Ethics changes

https://www.fm-magazine.com/news/2018/may/accounting-international-code-of-ethics-201818895.html Among the changes, extended cooling off period, changes to safeguards, and more provisions to come in the area of inducements.

Monday, March 19, 2018

Blockchain opportunities for auditors

http://blog.aicpa.org/2018/03/4-new-opportunities-blockchain-could-create-for-auditors.html#sthash.3sh9pkv7.dpbs

An AICPA white paper examines what firms may be auditing in the future related to blockchain.

Friday, March 9, 2018

Internal Audit fosters collaboration

https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/issues/2018/mar/effective-internal-audit.html Internal Audit fosters collaboration across three lines of defense In risk management, management control represents the first line of defense; risk and control monitoring represents the second line of defense; and independent assurance through the internal audit function is the third line of defense.

Thursday, January 18, 2018