Saturday, December 22, 2018
Simple puzzle
A lesson in exercising professional judgment
https://heleo.com/80-people-couldnt-solve-simple-puzzle-heres-can-learn-mistake/19562/
Wednesday, December 12, 2018
Monday, December 10, 2018
Saturday, November 24, 2018
Audit committee resource guide
https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/center-for-board-effectiveness/articles/audit-committee-resource-guide.html
Also this article on audit committee proxy disclosures
https://deloitte.wsj.com/riskandcompliance/2018/10/16/audit-committee-proxy-disclosures-to-enhance-or-not-to-enhance/?mod=djem_jiewr_AC_domainid
Also this article on audit committee proxy disclosures
https://deloitte.wsj.com/riskandcompliance/2018/10/16/audit-committee-proxy-disclosures-to-enhance-or-not-to-enhance/?mod=djem_jiewr_AC_domainid
Wednesday, November 14, 2018
Sunday, November 11, 2018
Wednesday, November 7, 2018
Saturday, November 3, 2018
Wednesday, October 17, 2018
Monday, October 15, 2018
Wednesday, October 10, 2018
Friday, October 5, 2018
Monday, October 1, 2018
Friday, September 21, 2018
Friday, September 14, 2018
Monday, September 10, 2018
Thursday, August 23, 2018
Aaron Beam of Health South
https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/podcast/healthsouth-fraud-lessons-learned.html
There is a 20 minute podcast with Aaron Beam discussing his time at Health South
Wednesday, August 15, 2018
A proposed standard change
Proposed revisions to SSAE 18.
terminology for what have been known as "review engagements" is proposed. Comments due Oct 11.
https://www.aicpa.org/content/dam/aicpa/research/exposuredrafts/accountingandauditing/downloadabledocuments/20180711a-ed-ssae-18-revisions.pdf
Monday, August 6, 2018
Language and fraud risk
https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/issues/2018/aug/how-language-affects-fraud-risk.html
Much of the article is about nonverbal communnications, such as email, and the use of emojis in several contexts. Emojis being considered as evidence in legal hearings, and the idea of emojis as code words among a network of conspirators. Very interesting article.
Thursday, August 2, 2018
Bentham Project
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bentham-project/
Resources related to Jeremy Bentham, whose theory of utilitarianism is one ethical model helpful when considering ethical dilemmas
Wednesday, August 1, 2018
Wednesday, July 25, 2018
PCAOB revolving door of employees to audit firms
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3205578
This paper provides basic facts on worker flows between former Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) employees and large audit firms.
Using a large sample of publicly available curricula vitae, we document that an increasing number of former PCAOB employees join U.S. audit firms
in senior-level positions during recent years. We also find that the number of PCAOB employees hired by these firms is positively related to the number
of deficiencies reported in their prior PCAOB inspection report, and that the number of deficiencies reported in firms’ future inspection reports is
negatively associated with the number of former PCAOB employees hired. However, this latter relation is not observed for the year in which these
employees join the firm, but rather during the subsequent period when the employees would be less likely to have personal access to private
information about the firm’s annual inspection. Although this pattern of findings is generally supportive of a “human capital” hypothesis, we are
unable to rule out that the future reductions may be attributable to former PCAOB employees that obtain confidential information about future
inspections via former colleagues at the PCAOB.
Tuesday, July 24, 2018
Monday, July 23, 2018
Sunday, July 15, 2018
Design Thinking
https://auditfutures.net/designing-education
We are developing resources and offer support in creating capacities for rethinking education and the future of work.
Tuesday, July 3, 2018
Friday, June 29, 2018
Tuesday, June 26, 2018
Monday, June 25, 2018
Friday, June 22, 2018
Wednesday, June 20, 2018
PCAOB Inspections: Public Accounting Firms on 'Trial'
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3165769##
* Abstract* The objective of our paper is to obtain a better understanding of how auditors anticipate the potential for PCAOB inspection, experience the inspection, cope with the consequences of the inspection, and understand the PCAOB’s influence within the context of professionalism. We use a qualitative approach that employs both surveys (55) and interviews (20) of auditors (of varying rank and firm) across a five-year period (2012-2017). Respondents suggest that PCAOB inspectors are powerful, representing the ‘prosecution’, ‘judge’, and ‘jury’ of the auditing profession. We therefore employ a structural metaphor of the PCAOB inspection as a judicial ‘trial’. By controlling the criteria for which to evaluate performance, inspectors have the power to repeatedly ‘subpoena’, ‘interrogate’, and return a ‘verdict’ on the firm (auditor); those judged as ‘guilty’ require supervised ‘probation’. This process is perceived as having improved audit quality, but at a cost. Passing an inspection is so important, that auditors (firms) have resorted to impression management strategies and “functionally stupid” work practices (e.g., excessive documentation, a decrease in critical thinking as a result of a “box ticking” approach to auditing). Further, some respondents believe that being a good auditor has come at the expense of being a good accountant; the emphasis on audit process and concurrent de-emphasis on technical accounting could ultimately lead to audits themselves falling short. In addition, it is evident that inspectors and auditors differ in their perceptions of risk; likely manifesting because inspectors are standards focused while auditors (firms) are methodology focused. Finally, the inspection process has created excessive stress and tension, beyond budget and fee pressures, which some auditors perceive as affecting the pool of talented auditors that firms may be able to attract and retain in the future.
* Keywords:* Auditing, Inspections, Metaphor, PCAOB, Professionalism, Qualitative
* Abstract* The objective of our paper is to obtain a better understanding of how auditors anticipate the potential for PCAOB inspection, experience the inspection, cope with the consequences of the inspection, and understand the PCAOB’s influence within the context of professionalism. We use a qualitative approach that employs both surveys (55) and interviews (20) of auditors (of varying rank and firm) across a five-year period (2012-2017). Respondents suggest that PCAOB inspectors are powerful, representing the ‘prosecution’, ‘judge’, and ‘jury’ of the auditing profession. We therefore employ a structural metaphor of the PCAOB inspection as a judicial ‘trial’. By controlling the criteria for which to evaluate performance, inspectors have the power to repeatedly ‘subpoena’, ‘interrogate’, and return a ‘verdict’ on the firm (auditor); those judged as ‘guilty’ require supervised ‘probation’. This process is perceived as having improved audit quality, but at a cost. Passing an inspection is so important, that auditors (firms) have resorted to impression management strategies and “functionally stupid” work practices (e.g., excessive documentation, a decrease in critical thinking as a result of a “box ticking” approach to auditing). Further, some respondents believe that being a good auditor has come at the expense of being a good accountant; the emphasis on audit process and concurrent de-emphasis on technical accounting could ultimately lead to audits themselves falling short. In addition, it is evident that inspectors and auditors differ in their perceptions of risk; likely manifesting because inspectors are standards focused while auditors (firms) are methodology focused. Finally, the inspection process has created excessive stress and tension, beyond budget and fee pressures, which some auditors perceive as affecting the pool of talented auditors that firms may be able to attract and retain in the future.
* Keywords:* Auditing, Inspections, Metaphor, PCAOB, Professionalism, Qualitative
Friday, June 15, 2018
Thursday, May 17, 2018
Monday, May 14, 2018
International Code of Ethics changes
https://www.fm-magazine.com/news/2018/may/accounting-international-code-of-ethics-201818895.html
Among the changes, extended cooling off period, changes to safeguards, and more provisions to come in the area of inducements.
Saturday, May 12, 2018
Friday, May 11, 2018
Monday, May 7, 2018
Wednesday, May 2, 2018
Tuesday, May 1, 2018
Wednesday, April 18, 2018
Monday, April 16, 2018
Thursday, April 12, 2018
Monday, April 2, 2018
Wednesday, March 28, 2018
Tuesday, March 27, 2018
Thursday, March 22, 2018
Wednesday, March 21, 2018
Monday, March 19, 2018
Blockchain opportunities for auditors
http://blog.aicpa.org/2018/03/4-new-opportunities-blockchain-could-create-for-auditors.html#sthash.3sh9pkv7.dpbs
An AICPA white paper examines what firms may be auditing in the future related to blockchain.
An AICPA white paper examines what firms may be auditing in the future related to blockchain.
Friday, March 16, 2018
Wednesday, March 14, 2018
Sunday, March 11, 2018
Friday, March 9, 2018
Internal Audit fosters collaboration
https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/issues/2018/mar/effective-internal-audit.html
Internal Audit fosters collaboration across three lines of defense
In risk management, management control represents the first line of defense; risk and control monitoring represents the second line of defense; and independent assurance through the internal audit function is the third line of defense.
Saturday, March 3, 2018
Friday, March 2, 2018
Tuesday, February 27, 2018
Wednesday, February 21, 2018
Saturday, February 17, 2018
Friday, January 26, 2018
Thursday, January 18, 2018
Guidance about audit reports
https://pcaobus.org/Standards/Documents/2017-12-04-Auditors-Report-Staff-Guidance.pdf
effective for audits of fiscal years ending on or after Dec. 15, 2017
Wednesday, January 10, 2018
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)